A large percent of the population have negative views about the production of oil shale because of the refining process and the amount of greenhouse gases released. Adam Brandt and Hiren Mulchandani, Stanford University, might have the answer for this problem -- EPICC (Electricity Production with In Situ Carbon Capture). EPICC is a proposed new technology that combines production of electricity with capture of carbon dioxide, producing electricity with in situ carbon capture in a self-fueled method.
EPICC reduces CO2 emissions by:
1. Utilizing waste heat to retort shale
2. Retoring shale beyond the point of HC production, converting much of the organic carbon in oil shale to char which is left in the subsurface
3. Using the produced HC gas to generate, which provides transportation services with no tailpipe emissions
From the research, the resulting life cycle of GHG emissions from EPICC is ~110 g of CO2 per km; this is ~0.5 times those of conventional fuel cycles and ~.33 time those from other proposed in situ oil shale conversion processes.
Some of the potential negatives of EPICC are: uncertain operation of subsurface fuel cells, potential geophysical impacts without pressure management, and economic concerns associated with the value of stranded energy left in the formation, and the long time period of retorting.
There are ~3 trillion bbl (discovered) of oil trapped within shale oil formations around the world. The United States has potentially 1 trillion barrels of oil; the world's largest deposit is in the Green River Formation right here in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. With this new proposed technology, the petroleum industry can better control the amount of greenhouse gases produced and help unlock resources in oil shale formations with better environmental controls.
Related Links:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/acs-ute042011.php
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/ef101714x
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110420112104.htm
Monday, April 25, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Global Oil Consumption
Find out how to invest in energy stocks at EnergyAndCapital.com.
Category
- Climate Change (2)
- Denver Basin (1)
- Environmental (3)
- Fayetteville (1)
- Fracturing (1)
- France (1)
- Gas Hydrates (1)
- Geology (1)
- Green River (2)
- Niobrara Formation (1)
- Obama (1)
- Permits (1)
- retirement (1)
- Shale (4)
- Technology (1)
- Unconventional (5)
- Water (1)
Interesting--it's great to see the industry trying to address these concerns. I think another major public concern is the amount of water required--so you may want to add that to your list. And I'm not sure what you mean by retorting the shale (is that explained in an earlier post?).
ReplyDeleteThe other question most of us will have is whether this is mostly at the experimental stage or if it's close to application. Let us know what you think.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteEPICC is in in situ process of oil extraction so the amount of water required is significantly less because they are retorting (extraction method involving pyrolysis and heating the kerogen to convert/separated into bitumen).
ReplyDeleteEPICC is only a proposed technology so it will be interesting to see if some companies like shell pick this up and apply it to a test site. I think with oil prices rising and environmental issues that this technology will be a big hit in the near future.
Good post...growing up in Alberta I've seen plenty of discussion on new oil extraction and refinery and with the recent negative press the area has been getting there has been a lot of it lately.
ReplyDelete